A judge’s gavel placed on a law book with the text Civil Procedure Code and a faint Scales of Justice watermark.

CPC Order XLII–XLVII Explained

Delhi Law Academy Civil Law Leave a Comment

image with the text 'civil procedure code

📘 CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE : ORDER XLII – XLVII

Preparation for RJS, DJS, PCS (J) and other Judicial Service exams


📚 CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE EXPLAINED

The Civil Procedure Code forms the bedrock of any and every Judicial Service exam in the country.
Its thorough knowledge is a must for all aspirants of RJS, DJS, PCS (J) and every other Judicial
Service exam.

To help such aspirants DELHI LAW ACADEMY JAIPUR has launched a series of study material
modules on all important aspects of this vital part of their syllabus:


⚖️ ORDER XLII — APPEALS FROM APPELLATE DECREES

Procedure — Rule 1

  • 📌 The rules of Order XLI
  • ➡️ shall apply to appeals from appellate decrees

Appeal on the question formulated — Rule 2

  • 📌 Court shall formulate
  • ➡️ the substantial question of law as required by section 100
  • 📌 Court may direct
  • ➡️ that the second appeal be heard on the question so formulated and
  • ➡️ it shall not be open to the appellant to urge any other ground without leave of Court

📑 ORDER XLIII — APPEALS FROM ORDERS

Appeal from orders — Rule 1

  • 🔹 An appeal shall lie from:
  • ➡️ an order u/r 10 of Order VII
  • 📌 returning a plaint to be presented to proper Court
  • ➡️ an order u/r 9 of Order IX
  • 📌 rejecting an application for an order to set aside dismissal of a suit
  • ➡️ an order u/r 13 of Order IX
  • 📌 rejecting an application for an order to set aside a decree passed ex parte
  • ➡️ an order under rule 21 of Order XI
  • ➡️ an order u/r 34 of Order XXI
  • 📌 on an objection to the draft of a document
  • ➡️ an order u/r 9 of Order XXII
  • 📌 refusing to set aside the abatement or dismissal of a suit
  • ➡️ an order u/r 5 or rule 7 of Order XXXIII
  • 📌 rejecting an application for permission to sue as an indigent person
  • ➡️ orders in interpleader-suits
  • 📌 under rule 3, rule 4 or rule 6 of Order XXXV
  • ➡️ an order under rule 2, rule 3 or rule 6 of Order XXXVIII
  • ➡️ an order u/r 1, 2, 2A, 4 or 10 of Order XXXIX
  • ➡️ an order u/r 4 of Order XLVII granting an application for review

Right to challenge non-appealable orders — Rule 1A

  • 📌 Where any order is made against a party and
  • ➡️ thereupon any judgment is pronounced against such party and a decree is drawn up
  • 📌 such party may contend
  • ➡️ in an appeal against the decree
  • ➡️ that such order should not have been made and
  • ➡️ that the judgment should not have been pronounced

🤝 Compromise decree

  • 📌 In an appeal against a decree
  • ➡️ passed after recording a compromise or refusing to record a compromise
  • 📌 it shall be open to the appellant
  • ➡️ to contest the decree on the ground
  • ➡️ that the compromise should, or should not, have been recorded

Procedure — Rule 2

  • 📌 Rules of Order XLI
  • ➡️ shall apply so far as may be
  • ➡️ to appeals from orders

🔁 ORDER XLVII — REVIEW

Application for review of judgment — Rule 1

  • 📌 Any person aggrieved
  • ➡️ by a decree or order
  • ➡️ from which an appeal is allowed but from which no appeal has been preferred or
  • ➡️ by a decree or order
  • ➡️ from which no appeal is allowed and
  • 📌 who
  • ➡️ from discovery of new and important matter or evidence
  • ➡️ which after exercise of due diligence was not within his knowledge at the time when the decree or order was passed or
  • ➡️ which after exercise of due diligence could not be produced by him at the time when the decree was passed or order made or
  • ➡️ on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of record or
  • ➡️ for any other sufficient reason
  • 📌 desires to obtain
  • ➡️ a review of the decree or order made against him
  • 📌 may apply for a review of the judgment
  • ➡️ to the Court which passed the decree or order

Rule 2

  • 📌 A party who is not appealing from a decree or order
  • ➡️ may apply for a review of judgment
  • ➡️ notwithstanding pendency of an appeal by some other party
  • 📌 except
  • ➡️ where ground of such appeal is common to the applicant and the appellant or
  • ➡️ when, being respondent, he can present to the Appellate Court the case on which he applies for review

Explanation

  • 📌 The fact that
  • ➡️ the decision on a question of law on which judgment of Court is based
  • ➡️ has been reversed or modified by a subsequent decision of a superior Court in any other case
  • ❌ shall not be a ground
  • ➡️ for review of such judgment

Application where rejected — Rule 4 (1)

  • 📌 Where it appears to court
  • ➡️ that there is no sufficient ground for review
  • ❌ it shall reject the application

Application where granted — Rule 4 (2)

  • 📌 Where the court is of opinion
  • ➡️ that the application for review should be granted
  • ✅ it shall grant the same
  • ❗ No such application shall be granted
  • ➡️ without previous notice to the opposite party and
  • ❗ no such application shall be granted
  • ➡️ on the ground of discovery of new matter or evidence
  • ➡️ which the applicant alleges was not within his knowledge or could not be adduced by him when the decree or order was passed or made
  • ➡️ without strict proof of such allegation

📘 Free Study Material for Judiciary Aspirants!

Download our FREE study material prepared by Delhi Law Academy’s expert faculty.


✅ Check Free Study Material


❓ Frequently Asked Questions — CPC Orders XLII, XLIII & XLVII

Order XLII deals with appeals from appellate decrees. It provides that the rules of Order XLI apply to such appeals, and includes the procedure for formulating the substantial question of law (as required by s.100) when a second appeal is directed to be heard on that question.

Under Rule 2 of Order XLII the Court may formulate the substantial question of law and direct that the second appeal be heard only on that question. Once so directed, the appellant cannot urge other grounds without the Court’s leave.

Order XLIII lists several appealable orders (e.g., orders under r.10 of Order VII returning a plaint, r.9 of Order IX rejecting an application to set aside dismissal, r.13 of Order IX re ex parte decrees, orders under Order XI r.21, Order XXI r.34 on draft objections, Order XXII r.9 refusing to set aside abatement, and interpleader rules under Order XXXV, among others).

Yes. Rule 1A of Order XLIII allows a party, when appealing against a decree, to contend that an interim or earlier order made against them should not have been made and that the resulting judgment and decree should not have been pronounced — thereby permitting challenge to certain non-appealable orders in the appeal against the decree.

Any person aggrieved by a decree or order (whether an appeal lies or not) may apply for review to the same Court on grounds such as discovery of new and important evidence (not within his knowledge despite due diligence), mistake or error apparent on the face of the record, or any other sufficient reason as stated in Rule 1 of Order XLVII.

No. The Explanation to Order XLVII Rule 2 states that the fact that a question of law on which the judgment was based has been reversed or modified by a subsequent decision of a superior Court in another case shall not be ground for review of the earlier judgment.

Contact us

📍 Delhi Law Academy – Jaipur Branch
6C, Tower 2, Coaching Hub, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur – 302033

📞 Phone:
+91 9911916552
+91 8447285606

✉️ Email:
contactus@delhilawacademy.com

🎯 Delhi Law Academy offers:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *