
📘 Article 370 – Provisions After 6th August 2019
Delhi Law Academy Jaipur presents below for aspirants of RJS, DJS, PCS (J) and other Judicial Services throughout India a simplified Note on the provisions of Article 370 after the Constitution Order of 6th August, 2019.
📜 ARTICLE 370 w.e.f. 6TH AUGUST, 2019
ARTICLE 370 w.e.f. 6TH AUGUST, 2019
Article 370
🔵 THE DEVELOPMENTS OF 2019:
Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 2019
C.O. 272 5 August 2019
- In exercise of powers conferred by clause (1) of article 370
- the President, with concurrence of the Govt of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, is pleased to make the following Order:
- This Order
- may be called the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order 2019
- shall come into force at once and shall thereupon supersede the Constitution Order 1954
- All provisions of the Constitution as amended from time to time
- shall apply to the State of Jammu and Kashmir
- These provisions shall apply with the following exceptions and modifications:
- To article 367, there shall be added the following clause:
(4) For purposes of this Constitution as it applies to the State of Jammu and Kashmir
- (a)
- references to this Constitution
- shall be construed as references to the Constitution as applied in relation to the said State
- references to this Constitution
- (b)
- references to the person
- recognized by the President on recommendation of the Legislative Assembly of the State
- as Sadar-i-Riyasat of Jammu and Kashmir acting on the advice of Council of Ministers for the time being in office
- shall be construed as references to the Governor of Jammu and Kashmir
- references to the person
- (c)
- references to the Govt of the said State
- shall be construed as including references to the Governor of Jammu and Kashmir acting on the advice of his Council of Ministers
- references to the Govt of the said State
- (d)
- in proviso to clause (3) of article 370:
- the expression “Constituent Assembly of the State referred to in clause (2)”
- shall read “Legislative Assembly of the State”
📝 Explanatory Notes by DLA on CO 272 dated August 5, 2019
- The Presidential Order uses Article 370(1)(d) to apply all provisions of the Indian Constitution (other than Articles 1 and 370 – which are already applicable) to J&K.
- The concurrence of J&K government is necessary to effect such a step but since J&K is presently under President’s rule and has no state government, this was effectively dispensed with.
- While applying provisions of the Constitution to J&K, the President effected one ‘modification’ to Article 367.
- In Article 367, the Presidential Order inserts a new sub-clause (4)(d) which states that the words “Constituent Assembly” in Article 370(3) must be read as “Legislative Assembly of the State”.
- The government has sought to overcome the problem of the Constituent Assembly not having abrogated Article 370 by requiring that “Constituent Assembly” in Article 370(3) be read as the J&K Assembly.
- By doing so, it now becomes possible for the J&K Assembly to do what the Constituent Assembly did not i.e. recommend abrogation of Article 370.
- To be clear, the President has not amended Article 370(3) itself because he does not have the power to do so.
- He can only modify other provisions of the Constitution when making them applicable to J&K.
- Applying this new interpretation of Article 370(3), the President could have abrogated Article 370 upon a recommendation to this effect being made by the J&K Assembly.
- But since J&K is now under President’s rule and has no legislative assembly at the moment, it fell upon Parliament to make this recommendation under the newly ‘modified’ Article 370(3).
📘 Further Notes
- The President’s power to modify the Constitution under Article 370(1)(d) is only limited to J&K.
- The power to amend the Constitution vests exclusively with Parliament.
- Currently therefore, the Constitution as it is applicable to J&K contains Article 367(4)(d) which requires ‘Constituent Assembly’ in Article 370(3) to be read as the J&K Assembly but this is only applicable to J&K.
- A formal amendment to Article 367 or Article 370(3) would strengthen the President’s hand as and when he does issue a notification to abrogate Article 370.
🔵 Declaration under Article 370(3) of the Constitution:
C.O. 273 6th August, 2019
- In exercise of powers conferred by article 370(3) read with article 370(1):
- the President is pleased to declare
- on the recommendation of Parliament
- that all clauses of article 370 shall cease to be operative from 6th August 2019
- except the following:
Article 370:
- All provisions of this Constitution, as amended from time to time
- without any modifications or exceptions
- shall apply to the State of Jammu and Kashmir…
- notwithstanding anything contrary
- in article 152 or 308 or any other article of this Constitution or
- in any other provision of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir or
- in any law, judgment, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having the force of law in India or
- in any other instrument, treaty or agreement as envisaged under article 363 or otherwise
📘 THE PRESENT POSITION:
Article 370:
- All provisions of this Constitution
- shall apply to the State of Jammu and Kashmir…
- without any modifications or exceptions
📘 Stay Ahead with Delhi Law Academy!
Get access to free monthly current affairs, read our insightful blogs,
and explore free study resources prepared by experts at DLA Jaipur. 🚀
❓ FAQs on Article 370 (2019 Amendments & Current Position)
📘 What did the Constitution Order (C.O. 272) of 5 August 2019 do?
C.O. 272 superseded the 1954 Presidential Order and applied all provisions of the Indian Constitution to Jammu & Kashmir. It also modified Article 367 by redefining “Constituent Assembly” in Article 370(3) to mean the “Legislative Assembly of the State,” enabling further constitutional steps under Article 370.
🏛️ Why was Article 367 modified as part of the 2019 changes to Article 370?
Article 367 was modified to insert clause (4)(d), which replaced the expression “Constituent Assembly of the State” in Article 370(3) with “Legislative Assembly of the State.” This allowed constitutional processes to continue despite the original Constituent Assembly having dissolved in 1957 without recommending abrogation of Article 370.
📜 How did the President issue a declaration under Article 370(3) in C.O. 273?
Under C.O. 273 issued on 6 August 2019, the President—using powers under Article 370(3) read with Article 370(1)—declared Article 370 inoperative based on the recommendation of Parliament. This was legally possible because, after the modification in Article 367, Parliament stood in place of the J&K Legislative Assembly during President’s Rule.
⚖️ What is the present legal position of Article 370 after August 2019?
The present position is that all provisions of the Indian Constitution apply to Jammu & Kashmir without any modifications or exceptions. Article 370 remains only as a framework provision stating that the Constitution applies fully to the State.
📝 Why was the concurrence of the J&K Government not required for C.O. 272?
Because Jammu & Kashmir was under President’s Rule at the time and had no elected State Government, the President acted on behalf of the State Government. Therefore, concurrence was deemed satisfied, allowing the Presidential Order to be issued without a sitting ministry in J&K.
📑 What is the difference between C.O. 272 and C.O. 273 issued in August 2019?
C.O. 272 (5 August 2019) applied the entire Indian Constitution to J&K and modified Article 367. C.O. 273 (6 August 2019) invoked Article 370(3) to declare Article 370 inoperative except for a minimal clause affirming full constitutional application. Together, they removed all special status previously granted to J&K.
Contact us
📍 Delhi Law Academy – Jaipur Branch
6C, Tower 2, Coaching Hub, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur – 302033
📞 Phone:
+91 9911916552
+91 8447285606
✉️ Email:
contactus@delhilawacademy.com

